Lifecycle orchestrating is not about deploying another system, architecture, or infrastructure. It is about how organizations operate across the product development lifecycle—how people collaborate, how data is structured and shared, how processes adapt, and how decisions translate into sustained value. This second post examines the five shifts that determine PLM maturity, distinguishing between organizations that implement PLM enabling tech and those that operate it as a lifecycle operating model.
PLM capabilities ultimately decide whether product innovation efforts translate into profitable, sustainable products—or devolve into costly physical experiments, late-stage rework, and repeated prototyping cycles. The differentiators are rarely the tools themselves, nor the workflows or features often emphasized in transformation programs. What matters is whether PLM enables effective orchestration across the lifecycle and is adopted, reinforced, and continuously optimized over time.
At maturity, PLM does not behave as a system teams log into. It functions as an operating model teams work within—coordinating people, data, processes, and decisions from early definition through industrialization, operation, and improvement.
The difference between these two realities is explained by five fundamental shifts.
From Implementation to Operating Model
These five shifts mark the transition from PLM as a technical data infrastructure to PLM as a lifecycle operating model—one that establishes shared context, enables distributed decision-making, and creates the conditions for analytics, AI, and intelligence to scale responsibly:
- People and collaboration over rigid process
- Connected data over document silos
- Flexible processes over fixed workflows
- Enabling technology over system complexity
- Sustainable return over short-term gain
Each shift requires operational principles that balance speed with discipline, creativity with traceability, and autonomy with governance. Together, they move PLM beyond compliance and system rollout toward continuous adoption and continuous optimization, where value compounds over time rather than peaking at go-live.
1. From Rigid Process to People and Collaboration
Many PLM initiatives fail not because processes are incorrect, but because processes are treated as the objective. Workflows are engineered in detail, approvals are codified, and success is measured by adherence. The result is often compliance without effectiveness.
The shift is toward an interaction-centric operating model, where collaboration is designed into how work happens—not layered on top of rigid flows.
In mature organizations, PLM does not force collaboration; it enables it by providing shared context. Decisions are co-created across disciplines rather than handed off sequentially. Governance evolves from policing steps to guiding intent.
Adoption is critical here. Collaboration improves only when teams repeatedly experience that shared data reduces friction and improves outcomes.
Signs of maturity:
- R&D, engineering, and science share ownership of product definition.
- Manufacturing, procurement, and supply chain are engaged early by design.
- Quality and compliance rely on data visibility, not document requests.
- Decision cycles shorten because context is already available.
When collaboration is embedded, PLM accelerates execution instead of constraining it.
2. From Document Silos to Connected Data
Document-centric development remains one of the largest inhibitors to PLM maturity. Files fragment context, break traceability, and force downstream teams to reinterpret information rather than consume it directly. The cost appears later—in defects, delays, and rework.
The shift is toward connected product data, structured around the product rather than the document. Requirements, specifications, BOMs, formulations, geometries, test results, and design histories become linked objects with explicit relationships.
This connectivity is what enables analytics democratization. When data is structured and connected, insight is no longer confined to specialists or central teams. Engineers, manufacturing teams, quality, and supply chain can all access and analyze lifecycle data relevant to their decisions.
Connected data also provides the foundation for enterprise data platforms—whether data lakes or lakehouses—without turning PLM into a reporting system. PLM remains the system of lifecycle context; analytics platforms extend its reach.
Signs of maturity:
- Product structures exist independently of documents.
- Traceability across the lifecycle is immediate.
- Impact analysis is routine, not exceptional.
- Teams trust the data enough to act on it.
At this stage, organizations stop managing documents and start managing the lifecycle itself.
3. From Fixed Workflows to Flexible Lifecycle Processes
Fixed workflows promise control but struggle with change. As product complexity increases and market conditions evolve, rigid flows resist adaptation. Workarounds emerge, governance weakens, and adoption suffers.
The shift is toward flexible, modular lifecycle processes—processes that provide guardrails rather than scripts.
This flexibility is essential for continuous optimization. Mature PLM organizations expect processes to evolve based on feedback, adoption patterns, and operational learning. Process change becomes routine rather than disruptive.
Signs of maturity:
- Processes adapt without major system redesign.
- Exceptions are governed, not improvised.
- Teams understand decision intent, not just steps.
- PLM supports innovation rather than enforcing conformity.
Flexibility ensures PLM scales with complexity instead of becoming brittle.
4. From System Complexity to Enabling Technology
Complexity is often mistaken for capability. Over time, PLM environments accumulate customizations, integrations, and modules that outpace the operating model. Adoption declines as usability suffers.
The shift is toward enabling technology—technology that disappears into the background while improving decision quality and flow.
This is also where AI becomes relevant, but only after the fundamentals are in place. AI does not compensate for disconnected data or poor adoption. It amplifies what already exists. In mature environments, AI supports foresight, pattern recognition, and scenario evaluation—without replacing human judgment.
Signs of maturity:
- Customization is limited and intentional.
- User experience aligns with real work.
- Data flows cleanly across functions.
- AI is applied to insight, not novelty.
Technology serves the operating model, not the other way around.
5. From Short-Term Gains to Sustainable Return
PLM success is often declared at deployment. Systems go live, users are trained, and workflows execute. Yet lifecycle value emerges later—through better decisions, fewer surprises, and improved resilience.
The final shift is toward sustainable lifecycle return on operations, reinforced through continuous adoption and continuous optimization.
Return appears in manufacturability, change predictability, quality stability, sustainability performance, and portfolio resilience. These benefits compound across product generations.
Signs of maturity:
- Value is measured across the lifecycle, not by project milestones.
- Sustainability and circularity influence early decisions.
- Change execution improves over time.
- Innovation accelerates without eroding governance.
This is where PLM proves itself as an operating model.
What These Shifts Reveal
Taken together, the five shifts reveal a simple truth: PLM maturity is not driven by technology alone. It is driven by orchestration.
Like a well-run orchestra, performance depends not on individual brilliance, but on shared rhythm, shared structure, and shared intent. Data provides the score. Processes define the tempo. People create the performance. Intelligence emerges when everything plays together.
Organizations that internalize these shifts move beyond PLM as a system of record. They establish PLM as a system of engagement and, ultimately, a system of intelligence—one capable of supporting analytics at scale, enabling AI responsibly, and delivering sustained return on operations.
What are your thoughts?
Disclaimer: articles and thoughts published on v+d do not necessarily represent the views of the company, but solely the views or interpretations of the author(s); reviews, insights and mentions of publications, products, or services do neither constitute endorsement, nor recommendations for purchase or adoption.
About the Author
