Clayton Christensen’s The Innovator’s Dilemma (1997) is one of the most influential business books of the modern era. Its thesis is counterintuitive:
Great companies fail not because of weak leadership or poor execution, but precisely because they are well managed.
By focusing on their most profitable customers, doubling down on sustaining technologies, and applying rigorous investment logic, incumbents inadvertently blind themselves to disruptive technologies. These new entrants typically start small, look unattractive, and often appear to underperform. Yet, they steadily improve until they displace the old order.
For executives driving digital transformation, the lesson is clear: disruption is not just about new technology—it’s about organizational logic. Digital transformation isn’t merely digitization of existing processes; it’s about building the capacity to respond to disruptive forces before they become existential. Timing is critical, especially for startups and new ventures: launching digital capabilities at the right moment can determine whether you disrupt—or end up disrupted.
Sustaining vs Disruptive Innovation
Christensen shows how “good management” creates predictable failure patterns. By listening to their most profitable customers and focusing on near-term returns, established firms consistently reject early-stage innovations. The dilemma is stark: do leaders continue to optimize their core business, or do they divert scarce resources toward unproven, low-margin innovations that may cannibalize their existing markets?
Digital transformation reframes this dilemma. At its best, it equips organizations with digital thread, real-time visibility, and agile operating models, enabling balance: sustaining core operations while experimenting in disruptive arenas.
To understand this, Christensen distinguishes:
- Sustaining technologies improve products in ways existing customers value.
- Disruptive technologies initially underperform on those dimensions—but are simpler, cheaper, or more accessible, unlocking entirely new markets.
Digital transformation mirrors this duality. Cloud computing began as “disruptive”—underpowered and insecure compared to on-premise data centers—yet is now the enterprise standard. AI assistants, once dismissed as novelties, are evolving into agentic systems that could redefine how R&D, manufacturing, and supply chains operate.
The lesson: treating digital transformation purely as sustaining—upgrading the ERP or digitizing workflows—misses its disruptive potential. Embrace it as a platform for new value creation and you’ll define the next era.
Key Principles of Disruptive Innovation
Christensen distilled when smart management starts to break:
- Customer-driven allocation: Mainstream firms rarely fund technologies their best customers don’t yet demand.
- Small markets cannot satisfy large companies: As firms grow, they need bigger opportunities to move the needle. This makes it hard to justify early bets in nascent markets—precisely where disruption begins.
- Uncharted markets defy forecasts: Traditional ROI models fail when markets don’t yet exist.
- Organizational constraints: Processes and values that worked before can become limitations in new contexts.
- Technology overshoot: Firms often overserve customer needs, leaving space for simpler alternatives.
Digital transformation can help large firms overcome this scale bias. By lowering the cost of experimentation through cloud platforms, digital twins, and agile teams, even “too small to matter” opportunities can be explored without threatening core operations.
Christensen’s recommendations align with modern strategies:
- Autonomous units: Create separate teams—incubators, digital factories, venture arms—to explore disruptive innovation outside core influences.
- Size-to-market fit: Small, empowered teams excel in new spaces.
- Discovery-driven planning: View investments as experiments—your forecast is probably wrong.
- Iterative scaling: Launch early, imperfect products and refine as needs evolve.
Digital transformation—cloud-native platforms, modular architectures, AI-powered analytics—makes all this viable at scale.
Lessons for Today’s Leaders
Disruption is in plain sight: EVs and autonomous systems began as fringe tech, e-commerce scaled from niche to ubiquitous, telemedicine evolved from inferior to indispensable. In each case, digital transformation let leaders detect weak signals, experiment, and pivot before expectations drifted irreversibly.
The Innovator’s Dilemma doesn’t warn of complacency; it reveals a deeper logic—failure arises from doing the right things, at the wrong time. Digital transformation is among the best modern responses. With agility, data visibility, and modular systems, organizations can both sustain today’s core and incubate tomorrow’s breakthroughs.
The line between sustaining and disruptive innovation blurs further every day. Even incremental initiatives can be disruptive when powered by AI, digital twins, and integrated digital threads. Timing and speed still matter—but incumbents can outpace startups by leveraging scale, orchestration, and data. And don’t forget antropy—the messiness of human complexity in adopting new technologies—which remains a central leadership challenge.
Quick takeaways:
- Smart companies fail because they over-invest in what works right now.
- Prioritizing current profits can blind firms to emerging disruption.
- Digital transformation is not just digitization—it is the ability to sense, experiment, pivot.
- Timing is everything: get there first—and thoughtfully—and you win the future.
Ultimately, the question for leaders is: will you use digital transformation to manage disruption on your own terms—or wait until others rewrite the rules for you?
What are your thoughts?
Disclaimer: articles and thoughts published on v+d do not necessarily represent the views of the company, but solely the views or interpretations of the author(s); reviews, insights and mentions of publications, products, or services do neither constitute endorsement, nor recommendations for purchase or adoption.
About the Author
