When it comes to modern manufacturing, there is often a temptation to consolidate or blur the lines between platforms such as Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) and Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES). However, in practice, maintaining a clear segregation of duties between these two sets of capabilities is crucial. Each solution has a distinct role to play within its own domain, and this is essential to understand where PLM’s responsibilities end and MES’s begin. Both PLM and MES are part of the four cornerstones of manufacturing, in addition to ERP and CRM, which all serve a specific purpose with associated interdependencies.
In this post, I explore how to best drive functional separation between PLM and MES, ensuring that both platforms operate in their respective lanes without overstepping or compromising operational efficiency. The discussion refers to their respective business capabilities and functional scope, though it does not imply that each platform is, or had to be considered as, a single system or IT tool.
PLM: Strategic Core of Product Data
PLM is responsible for governing the entire product lifecycle—from concept and design through development and into its final market phase. It is the central system that manages product-related data, design decisions, and revisions before production ever begins. PLM is strategic in nature, focusing on long-term product innovation and governance.
Core PLM duties include:
- Product definition and design control: PLM governs the creation and approval of product designs, specifications, CAD files, and Bill of Materials (BOMs). The system provides a single source of truth for product-related data.
- Version and change management: PLM maintains rigorous control over product iterations, ensuring that any modifications are reviewed, approved, and tracked. This is critical for managing engineering change requests (ECRs) and product updates.
- Compliance and regulatory oversight: PLM ensures that products are designed to meet industry standards and regulatory requirements before they are sent to manufacturing.
At its core, PLM is focused on what a product is and how it should be built—setting the stage for the downstream execution handled by MES.
MES: Shop Floor Delivery Engine
Once product data is finalized in PLM, MES takes over to handle the execution of manufacturing operations. MES is focused solely on production, driving shop-floor analytics and managing the day-to-day activities of the factory floor. It transforms product specifications from PLM into actionable steps, overseeing production schedules, machine operations, and quality control.
Core MES duties include:
- Production scheduling and management: MES takes the product data from PLM and manages the manufacturing process—ensuring the right materials are used at the right time, and that machines are running efficiently.
- Real-time monitoring: MES provides live updates on machine performance, operator productivity, and work-in-progress status, allowing for quick adjustments to maintain production flow.
- Quality assurance: While PLM defines quality requirements, MES enforces these standards during production, monitoring quality in real-time and ensuring that each product meets the specifications outlined in the PLM.
In essence, MES is focused on how the product is made, ensuring that production follows the guidelines and specifications provided by PLM.
Why Segregation of Duties Matters
Rather than striving for a convergence between PLM and MES, manufacturers should prioritize segregation of duties to avoid overlapping responsibilities, which can lead to data confusion, inefficiency, and operational risk. Each system is designed with a specific role in mind, and attempting to combine or blur these roles can introduce complexities that hinder the overall manufacturing process.
- Data ownership: PLM is the master of product data (e.g., designs, BOMs), while MES is responsible for production data (e.g., machine settings, process control). By keeping these data streams separate, companies ensure that there is no duplication or mismanagement.
- System integrity: PLM controls product innovation and the evolution of designs, keeping a strategic view of the product lifecycle. MES, on the other hand, focuses on the operational aspects of turning designs into physical products on the shop floor. Trying to blur this distinction can compromise the integrity of both systems.
- Risk management: PLM’s role in governing changes to product data ensures that modifications are carefully considered before they are passed downstream. MES’s role is to execute production based on the final approved data from PLM. If these roles overlap, unapproved changes could inadvertently be introduced into production, leading to errors and costly rework.
PLM and MES Handover: Clear Transition, Clear Responsibilities
The critical juncture where PLM hands over to MES must be clearly defined and controlled. This handover point is where the responsibility for product data shifts from strategic control (PLM) to tactical execution (MES). In practice, this means:
- PLM prepares the product data (finalized BOM, design, and process specifications) and ensures it is validated and approved before sending it downstream to MES.
- MES consumes that product data and takes responsibility for executing production, ensuring that the product is manufactured according to the specifications set in PLM.
There should be no ambiguity in this transition. Once MES takes over, the focus shifts to production efficiency and quality control, while PLM continues to manage future iterations, change requests, and product innovation.
Keep the boundaries clear: the role of PLM and MES in manufacturing systems is not about convergence or overlap, but rather about driving a clear separation of duties. PLM governs the strategic aspects of product design and lifecycle management, while MES focuses on the tactical execution of manufacturing operations. By keeping their roles distinct, manufacturers can ensure that both systems operate efficiently, without stepping on each other’s toes. For organizations looking to maximize the impact of both PLM and MES, the key is to recognize and respect the boundaries between these systems. This clear segregation allows for better collaboration, higher quality, and ultimately, a smoother, more efficient manufacturing process.
What are your thoughts?
Disclaimer: articles and thoughts published on v+d do not necessarily represent the views of the company, but solely the views or interpretations of the author(s); reviews, insights and mentions of publications, products, or services do neither constitute endorsement, nor recommendations for purchase or adoption.
About the Author
